![]() ![]() However, several viewers said that the EGO’s video quality was disappointing, and some viewers even said it was worse than a 360 camera. In my review, I said that the Qoocam EGO had better image quality than any consumer 360 camera as of May 2022 and has similar detail as a professional 360 camera (when comparing videos from the same distance and same field of view). Qoocam EGO uses a rare type of 3D viewerĬompared to these alternatives, Qoocam EGO arguably offers the best of both worlds: it is as detailed as a professional 360 camera, while also being as compact and affordable as a consumer 360 camera. ![]() There are professional 360 cameras that do offer higher resolution but they are large, heavy, often with a complicated workflow, and they cost thousands of dollars. However, consumer 360 cameras have a catch - because they have a 360 degree field of view, they have fewer pixels per degree and less detail than even a mediocre smartphone. When producing photos and videos for VR headsets, the typical choice is a 360 camera because it enables the user to look anywhere around the video in a VR headset. It seemed that Kandao was stepping backward.Īlthough Kandao’s move was surprising, I thought that upon reflection, it could make sense. It is the first non-360 3D camera from a 360 camera company that was known for producing 3D 360 and VR 180 cameras. Yesterday, Kandao officially released the Qoocam EGO, a 3D camera that surprised many 360 camera users. Kandao Qoocam EGO is a 3D camera with removable 3D viewer How does the Qoocam EGO’s video quality compare to that of a 360 camera or a VR180 camera? I compared the EGO’s video quality to Insta360 One RS and Lenovo Mirage. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |